Screener
BGRO vs GSSC
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.35% less per year.
- GSSC is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO is classified as alternative, while GSSC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BGRO follows a active selection strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
- GSSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $952M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.04% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -41.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and GSSC
Explore further