Screener
BGRO vs ICSH
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
BGRO is an alternative ETF, while ICSH is a fixed income ETF. BGRO charges 0.55% a year and ICSH 0.08%.
- BGRO is an alternative fund, while ICSH is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ICSH costs 0.47% less per year.
- ICSH is much larger than BGRO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | 4.38% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 3.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.88% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -3.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.