Screener
BGRO vs ISCG
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.49% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO is classified as alternative, while ISCG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BGRO follows a active selection strategy; ISCG uses index tracking.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $947M |
| Since | 2024 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.04% | 18.16% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -41.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and ISCG
Explore further