Screener
BGRO vs IVV
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.52% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO is classified as alternative, while IVV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BGRO follows a active selection strategy; IVV uses index tracking.
- IVV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $797.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.2% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.05% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -33.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and IVV
Explore further