Screener
BGRO vs XDQQ
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Innovator ETFs Trust
Key differences
- BGRO costs 0.24% less per year.
- XDQQ is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO follows a active selection strategy; XDQQ uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | XDQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $54M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.2% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.05% | 13.86% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -35.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and XDQQ
Explore further