Skip to content
Screener

BHYB vs PSH

Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF vs PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF

BHYB

Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$2.4B

PSH

PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$161M

Key differences

Both BHYB and PSH are fixed income ETFs. BHYB charges 0.20% a year and PSH 0.45%. The main difference: BHYB follows a index tracking strategy; PSH uses active selection.

  • BHYB follows a index tracking strategy; PSH uses active selection.
  • BHYB costs 0.25% less per year.
  • BHYB is much larger than PSH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

BHYBPSH
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$2.4B$161M
Since20232023
Dividend yield6.37%6.79%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+7.2%+5.7%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y3.44%2.87%
Max drawdown-4.23%-3.06%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to BHYB and PSH