Screener
BILT vs AOR
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOR costs 0.45% less per year.
- AOR is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BILT is classified as equity, while AOR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.53% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.47% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -22.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BILT and AOR
Explore further