Screener
BILT vs CWS
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- BILT costs 0.05% less per year.
- CWS is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $155M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -33.82% |
Similar to BILT and CWS
Explore further