Screener
BILT vs REET
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares Global REIT ETF
Key differences
- REET costs 0.46% less per year.
- REET is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BILT covers north america markets; REET covers global.
- BILT follows a active selection strategy; REET uses index tracking.
- REET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | REET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.05% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -44.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BILT and REET
Explore further