Screener
BINC vs FIGB
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
Key differences
- BINC is significantly larger than FIGB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; FIGB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | FIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $465M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 4.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 4.53% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -18.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINC and FIGB
Explore further