Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BINC vs HIGH

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Simplify Enhanced Income ETF

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.9B

HIGH

Simplify Enhanced Income ETF

Simplify Asset Management

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$79M

Key differences

  • BINC costs 0.10% less per year.
  • BINC is significantly larger than HIGH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BINC is classified as fixed income, while HIGH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • BINC follows a active selection strategy; HIGH uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

BINCHIGH
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$16.9B$79M
Since20232022
Dividend yield5.60%7.86%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+6.3%-4.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+3.1%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.00
Volatility 1Y2.29%8.98%
Max drawdown-2.69%-9.50%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BINC and HIGH