Screener
BINC vs IBHF
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF
Key differences
- IBHF costs 0.05% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than IBHF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; IBHF uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | IBHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $998M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 6.47% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 2.04% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -11.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINC and IBHF
Explore further