Screener
BINC vs IG
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.21% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than IG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $179M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINC and IG
Explore further