Screener
BINC vs ILTB
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- ILTB costs 0.34% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than ILTB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; ILTB uses index tracking.
- ILTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | ILTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $588M |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 4.94% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 8.07% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -36.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINC and ILTB
Explore further