Screener
BINC vs IYR
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- BINC is significantly larger than IYR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BINC is classified as fixed income, while IYR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; IYR uses index tracking.
- IYR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | IYR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $4.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -42.32% |
Similar to BINC and IYR
Explore further