Screener
BINC vs PFF
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Key differences
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; PFF uses index tracking.
- PFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | PFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $13.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 5.65% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +10.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 6.79% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINC and PFF
Explore further