Screener
BINC vs SCUB
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCUB costs 0.10% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $25M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | — |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -0.16% |
Similar to BINC and SCUB
Explore further