Screener
BINC vs VNLA
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- VNLA costs 0.17% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than VNLA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VNLA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | VNLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $3.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 5.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 0.65% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -4.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINC and VNLA
Explore further