Screener
BINV vs PWV
Brandes International ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- PWV costs 0.15% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than BINV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BINV covers global markets; PWV covers north america.
- BINV follows a active selection strategy; PWV uses index tracking.
- PWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINV | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $482M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 1.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.0% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.97% | 9.39% |
| Max drawdown | -14.91% | -37.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINV and PWV
Explore further