Screener
BITI vs BTRN
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF vs Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
Key differences
- BTRN costs 0.06% less per year.
- BITI is significantly larger than BTRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITI follows a inverse strategy; BTRN uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITI | BTRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $187M | $2M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 9.25% | 27.44% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | inverse | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | -15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -37.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.16% | 19.85% |
| Max drawdown | -92.16% | -36.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITI and BTRN
Explore further