Skip to content
Screener

BITK vs KONG

Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF

BITK

Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$2M

KONG

Formidable Fortress ETF

Annual cost

0.89%

Fund size

$22M

Key differences

Both BITK and KONG are alternative ETFs. BITK charges 0.99% a year and KONG 0.89%. The main difference: KONG costs 0.10% less per year.

  • KONG costs 0.10% less per year.
  • KONG is much larger than BITK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

BITKKONG
Annual cost (TER)0.99%0.89%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$22M
Since20252021
Dividend yield0.36%
Asset classalternativealternative
Region
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+4.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+8.4%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.42
Volatility 1Y10.95%
Max drawdown-56.27%-19.98%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BITK and KONG