Skip to content
Screener

BITK vs LQTI

Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF vs FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

BITK

Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$2M

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$288M

Key differences

Both BITK and LQTI are alternative ETFs. BITK charges 0.99% a year and LQTI 0.65%. The main difference: LQTI costs 0.34% less per year.

  • LQTI costs 0.34% less per year.
  • LQTI is much larger than BITK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

BITKLQTI
Annual cost (TER)0.99%0.65%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$288M
Since20252025
Dividend yield9.06%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+5.5%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y5.16%
Max drawdown-56.27%-3.41%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BITK and LQTI