Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BITS vs BITU

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF

BITS

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$29M

BITU

Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.98%

Fund size

$513M

Key differences

  • BITS costs 0.33% less per year.
  • BITU is significantly larger than BITS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BITS follows a active selection strategy; BITU uses leveraged.

Side-by-side comparison

BITSBITU
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.98%
Fund size (AUM)$29M$513M
Since20212024
Dividend yield22.55%19.70%
Asset classcryptocurrencycryptocurrency
Region
Strategyactive selectionleveraged
CAGR 1Y+24.8%-65.4%
CAGR 3Y+53.1%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.96N/A
Volatility 1Y52.75%86.30%
Max drawdown-83.11%-77.76%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BITS and BITU