Screener
BITS vs QYLG
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- QYLG costs 0.30% less per year.
- QYLG is significantly larger than BITS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITS is classified as cryptocurrency, while QYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BITS follows a active selection strategy; QYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, BITS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITS | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $142M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 22.55% | 6.59% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +34.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.6% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.62% | 12.31% |
| Max drawdown | -83.11% | -29.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITS and QYLG
Explore further