Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BITS vs RSSL

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF

BITS

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$29M

RSSL

Global X Russell 2000 ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.08%

Fund size

$1.4B

Key differences

  • RSSL costs 0.57% less per year.
  • RSSL is significantly larger than BITS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BITS is classified as cryptocurrency, while RSSL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • BITS follows a active selection strategy; RSSL uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

BITSRSSL
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.08%
Fund size (AUM)$29M$1.4B
Since20212024
Dividend yield22.55%1.33%
Asset classcryptocurrencyequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.8%+41.8%
CAGR 3Y+53.1%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.96N/A
Volatility 1Y52.75%19.19%
Max drawdown-83.11%-27.79%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BITS and RSSL