Screener
BKCH vs BETE
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.45% less per year.
- BKCH is significantly larger than BETE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKCH is classified as equity, while BETE is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BKCH follows a index tracking strategy; BETE uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | BETE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $9M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 74.10% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +108.0% | -26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +61.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.40% | 54.65% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -56.31% |
Similar to BKCH and BETE
Explore further