Screener
BKCH vs PAVE
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- PAVE is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.8% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +57.3% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.50% | 18.75% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKCH and PAVE
Explore further