Screener
BLCR vs CGVV
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
Key differences
- BLCR is significantly larger than CGVV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCR covers global markets; CGVV covers north america.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; CGVV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | CGVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $128M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.61% | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -10.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCR and CGVV
Explore further