Screener
BLCR vs IXUS
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.29% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than BLCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCR covers global markets; IXUS covers global ex us.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; IXUS uses index tracking.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | IXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $56.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 2.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.4% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.61% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -36.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCR and IXUS
Explore further