Screener
BLCR vs SMMD
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.21% less per year.
- BLCR covers global markets; SMMD covers north america.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; SMMD uses index tracking.
- SMMD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $3.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.4% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.61% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCR and SMMD
Explore further