Screener
BLCV vs FNDF
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDF costs 0.21% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than BLCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCV covers north america markets; FNDF covers global ex us.
- BLCV follows a active selection strategy; FNDF uses index tracking.
- FNDF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCV | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $317M | $23.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.64% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -13.44% | -40.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCV and FNDF
Explore further