Screener
BLCV vs MAVF
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Key differences
- BLCV costs 0.29% less per year.
- BLCV is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCV | MAVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $317M | $91M |
| Since | 2023 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 0.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.9% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.63% | 14.03% |
| Max drawdown | -13.44% | -14.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCV and MAVF
Explore further