Screener
BMED vs BLCV
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF vs iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
Key differences
- BLCV costs 0.09% less per year.
- BLCV is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BMED | BLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $317M |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.7% | +23.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.93% | 11.63% |
| Max drawdown | -36.44% | -13.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BMED and BLCV
Explore further