Screener
BMED vs ENHI
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.28% less per year.
- BMED is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BMED has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BMED | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $11M |
| Since | 2020 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.94% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.44% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BMED and ENHI
Explore further