Screener
BMED vs HEAL
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF vs Global X HealthTech ETF
Key differences
- HEAL costs 0.05% less per year.
- BMED follows a active selection strategy; HEAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BMED has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BMED | HEAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $25M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.0% | -20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | -10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | -14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.94% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -36.44% | -65.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BMED and HEAL
Explore further