Screener
BMED vs IBBQ
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF vs Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
Key differences
- IBBQ costs 0.36% less per year.
- IBBQ is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BMED follows a active selection strategy; IBBQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IBBQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BMED | IBBQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $65M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.0% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.94% | 19.50% |
| Max drawdown | -36.44% | -37.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BMED and IBBQ
Explore further