Screener
BNDD vs CAOS
Quadratic Deflation ETF vs Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
Both BNDD and CAOS are alternative ETFs. BNDD charges 1.02% a year and CAOS 0.63%. The main difference: BNDD follows a multi strategy strategy; CAOS uses volatility strategy.
- BNDD follows a multi strategy strategy; CAOS uses volatility strategy.
- CAOS costs 0.39% less per year.
- CAOS is much larger than BNDD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CAOS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CAOS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDD | CAOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.02% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $669M |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +1.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -3.2% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.48 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.57% | 1.53% |
| Max drawdown | -30.87% | -3.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.