Screener
BNDD vs IRVH
Quadratic Deflation ETF vs Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF
Key differences
BNDD is an alternative ETF, while IRVH is a fixed income ETF. BNDD charges 1.02% a year and IRVH 0.45%.
- BNDD is an alternative fund, while IRVH is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IRVH costs 0.57% less per year.
- BNDD is much larger than IRVH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IRVH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDD | IRVH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.02% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $1M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | 5.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | -0.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -3.2% | -0.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.48 | -0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.57% | 4.87% |
| Max drawdown | -30.87% | -14.97% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.