Screener
BNDS vs CGHY
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGHY costs 0.49% less per year.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while CGHY is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS covers north america markets; CGHY covers global.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; CGHY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | CGHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $94M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | — |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -2.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and CGHY
Explore further