Screener
BNDS vs CGSM
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSM costs 0.63% less per year.
- CGSM is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while CGSM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; CGSM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | CGSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 1.33% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -1.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and CGSM
Explore further