Screener
BNDS vs GVI
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
Key differences
- GVI costs 0.68% less per year.
- GVI is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while GVI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; GVI uses index tracking.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | GVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 3.56% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 2.52% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -12.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and GVI
Explore further