Screener
BNDS vs HIMU
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- HIMU costs 0.49% less per year.
- HIMU is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while HIMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; HIMU uses index tracking.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 5.16% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and HIMU
Explore further