Screener
BNDS vs IBHF
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF
Key differences
- IBHF costs 0.53% less per year.
- IBHF is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while IBHF is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; IBHF uses index tracking.
- IBHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | IBHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $998M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 6.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 2.04% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -11.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and IBHF
Explore further