Screener
BNDS vs IMTB
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.82% less per year.
- IMTB is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while IMTB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- IMTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $280M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 4.06% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and IMTB
Explore further