Screener
BNDS vs SLQD
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.82% less per year.
- SLQD is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while SLQD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; SLQD uses index tracking.
- SLQD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -12.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and SLQD
Explore further