Screener
BNDW vs VGMS
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF vs Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF
Key differences
- BNDW costs 0.25% less per year.
- BNDW is significantly larger than VGMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDW follows a index tracking strategy; VGMS uses active selection.
- BNDW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDW | VGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $215M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.14 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.38% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.21% | -2.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDW and VGMS
Explore further