Screener
BNDY vs BLV
Horizon Core Bond ETF vs Vanguard Long-Term Bond Fund
Key differences
- BLV costs 0.63% less per year.
- BLV is significantly larger than BNDY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDY is classified as alternative, while BLV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDY follows a option income strategy; BLV uses index tracking.
- BLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDY | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $186M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.77% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -3.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.33% |
| Max drawdown | -3.93% | -38.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDY and BLV
Explore further