Screener
BNDY vs SCCR
Horizon Core Bond ETF vs Schwab Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCCR costs 0.50% less per year.
- SCCR is significantly larger than BNDY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDY is classified as alternative, while SCCR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDY follows a option income strategy; SCCR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDY | SCCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $186M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.84% |
| Max drawdown | -3.93% | -2.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDY and SCCR
Explore further