Screener
BOND vs PCS
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund vs PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF
Key differences
- PCS costs 0.34% less per year.
- BOND is significantly larger than PCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOND | PCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $520M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.17% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.01% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.71% | -1.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOND and PCS
Explore further