Screener
BOND vs SPIB
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SPIB costs 0.50% less per year.
- BOND follows a active selection strategy; SPIB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SPIB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOND | SPIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $11.0B |
| Since | 2012 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.17% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.00% | 2.85% |
| Max drawdown | -19.71% | -14.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOND and SPIB
Explore further